Shi

Shi v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-2802California444 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 29 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FENG PING SHI, No. 23-2802

Petitioner, Agency No.

A203-468-417

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Feng Ping Shi petitions for review from the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal from an order of an Immigration

Judge (IJ) denying her claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial

evidence. Ai Jun Zhi v. Holder, 751 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.