Shi
Shi v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-2802California444 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 29 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FENG PING SHI, No. 23-2802
Petitioner, Agency No.
A203-468-417
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 24, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Feng Ping Shi petitions for review from the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal from an order of an Immigration
Judge (IJ) denying her claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial
evidence. Ai Jun Zhi v. Holder, 751 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th…