Redin
Redin v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-1017California1,233 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EVGENII REDIN; NADEZDA REDINA, No. 23-1017
Petitioners, Agency Nos.
A205-326-700
v. A205-326-701
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 25, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision
dismissing an appeal of an Immigration Judge (IJ)’s denial of their claims for
asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “[U]nder the highly deferential substantial
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…