Redin

Redin v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-1017California1,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVGENII REDIN; NADEZDA REDINA, No. 23-1017

Petitioners, Agency Nos.

A205-326-700

v. A205-326-701

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

dismissing an appeal of an Immigration Judge (IJ)’s denial of their claims for

asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “[U]nder the highly deferential substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.