Etame

Filed 10/29/24 Etame v. Ermel CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

MARTIAL ETAME, B331773

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. BC679337)

WOLFRAM ERMEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Yolanda Orozco, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Nathan Mubasher and Nathan Mubasher for Defendant and Appellant. Martial Etame, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________________ This is defendant and appellant Wolfram Ermel’s second appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent Martial Etame. In the prior appeal, Ermel challenged the trial court’s denial of…