People v. Wiseman CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2024B335635California428 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/29/24 P. v. Wiseman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B335635 (Super. Ct. No. 18CR06306) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

RICHARD WISEMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

On October 24, 2019, Richard Wiseman pled guilty to inflicting corporal injury on a former spouse by strangulation (Pen. Code1 § 273.5) and dissuading a witness from reporting a crime (§ 136.1, subd. (b)(1)). He was sentenced to three years of probation. Wiseman also pled guilty to stalking when a restraining order is in effect. (§ 646.9, subd. (b).) In December 2021, the trial court dismissed the stalking count on the ground that no restraining order was in effect.

1 All statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.