Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City

Good Law
120 F.4th 696
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 202422-17008California196 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN HART, individually and as No. 22-17008 co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C. No. 4:21-cv- as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 02653-YGR KYLE HART; W.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent

KYLE HART, ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; DANIEL MULHOLLAND, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY;

ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; LEILA VELEZ, individually and in her official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY,

Defendants-Appellants

Filed October 30, 2024 Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Miller, Judge Bade, and Judge VanDyke have voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.