United States v. Michael Feinberg

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 202422-10295California729 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10295

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:18-cr-01786-JAS-DTF-1 v.

MICHAEL FEINBERG, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10299

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:18-cr-01786-JAS-DTF-

BETSY FEINBERG,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Defendants Michael and Betsy Feinberg were tried and convicted for

conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and

multiple counts of securities fraud. Defendants were ordered to return

$4,925,134.79 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.