Rotan Holdings v. AU Energy CA2/6

Filed 10/30/24 Rotan Holdings v. AU Energy CA2/6 Opinion following rehearing

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

ROTAN HOLDINGS, LLC, 2d Civ. No. B324832 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2018- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00516210-CU-OR-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

OPINION ON REHEARING

AU ENERGY, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

Rotan Holdings, LLC, (Rotan) appeals from the judgment in favor of respondent AU Energy, LLC (AU Energy), following a court trial. Rotan contends the trial court erroneously ruled that it had not proved slander of its title to a gas station. The ruling was based on insufficiency of the evidence to establish that the slander had caused Rotan to suffer a direct pecuniary loss. Rotan also contends the trial…