People v. Rabiee CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 2024C096779California3,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 10/30/24 P. v. Rabiee CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C096779

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.

CRF180000729)

v.

HAMID RABIEE,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Hamid Rabiee, a neurologist, guilty of multiple counts of criminal sexual misconduct with his patients, including sexual exploitation of a patient under Business and Professions Code section 729. During the trial, 19 patients testified to the charged offenses and 5 others testified to similar uncharged offenses. Defendant contends the trial court prejudicially erred in two ways: (1) by reading a pattern jury instruction on the uncharged evidence and (2) by refusing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.