Amber Wilson v. City of Los Angeles
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20192:18-cv-08065California5,001 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
an OW OM Ea lc RR TPIS Pk ar POONA es t “Maw — Vw ew SMM TT □□ 2 4 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 |} AMBER WILSON and JASMINE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-08065-MWF-E RICHARDS, Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald - Ctrm. 5A, (First St. Courthouse) Plaintiffs Hon. Mag. Charles F. Eick - Ctrm. 750, 7” FI. (Roybal) “
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OFFICER AMENDED STIPULATED
|| M. NELSON; OFFICER J.
HABERKORN; OFFICER B. PROTECTIVE ORDER
|| POPULORUM; DET. A.
RODRIGUEZ; SGT. L. CALDERON;
|| OFFICER N. MADJD; OFFICER BEURNOK SER A TORRES: VALENZUELA; OFFICER FIELDS; Complaint fled: fh || SGT. J. TALMAGE, inclusive, Defendants. 21 22 || 1. A.,PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Plaintiffs assert claims for unlawful arrest and excessive force pursuant to 42 || USC Section 1983. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 27 || proprietary or private information for which special…