Valerie Arismendez v. Deputy Velasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20192:19-cv-08767California4,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Ul 19 VALERIE ARISMENDEZ CASE NO. 2:19-cv-08767-CJC (SSx) 13 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY MATTER 14 v. □□□ ROTECTIVE ORDER DEPUTY See DEPUTY GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF 16 BAEK; DEPUTY NEZ; DEPUTY “CONFIDENTIAL”

NOLASCO; COUNTY OF LOS.” INFORMATION

17 || ANGELES; and DOES 1-235, inclusive. Defendants. [Assigned to Hon. Cormac J. Carney ourtroom “7C”] 19 {Discovery Document: Referred to 20 □□□ _| Magistrate Susanne H. Segal] 21 22 || I. PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential o1 24 || private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 25 || for any purpose other than prosecuting this action may be warranted. Accordingly. ||the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following ||[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order (hereafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.