Valerie Morales v. Sprint Communications Company L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20202:19-cv-07937California4,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || VALERIE MORALES, an Case No. 2:19-cv-7937 SVW (KSx) individual ASSIGNED TO HONORABLE JUDGE Plaintiff, STEPHEN V. WILSON

V. DISCOVERY MATTER SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS [Referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. 1S || COMPANY L.P.; ADAM Stevenson] KAKEBEEN, an individual; and DOES through 25, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Defendants. ORDER 18 State Complaint Filed: July 2, 2019 (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 19STCV 23332) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Plaintiff VALERIE MORALES (‘Plaintiff’) on the one hand, and Defendant 2 || SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY (erroneously named and sued as || Sprint Communications L.P.) (collectively, “Defendant’) on the other, by and through 4 || their respective counsel of record, have AGREED and STIPULATED to the following: 5} 1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.