Latosha Latrice Nowden v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20205:18-cv-02475California6,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATOSHA N., Case No. ED CV 18-2475-SP Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

15 Social Security Administration. Defendant. 17 Vo 19 INTRODUCTION On November 26, 2018, plaintiff Latosha N. filed a complaint against 22 || defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), 23 || seeking a review of a denial of a period of disability, disability insurance benefits 24 || (“DIB”), and supplemental security income (“SSI’’). The parties have fully briefed 25 || the matters in dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication 26 || without oral argument. Plaintiff presents three disputed issues for decision: (1) whether the

1 || administrative law judge (“ALJ”) properly included all limitations opined by the 2 || examining physician in his residual functional capacity (“RFC”) determination; (2) 3 || whether the ALJ properly considered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.