DMF Inc v. AMP Plus Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20202:18-cv-07090California10,484 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

On March 19, 2020, the Court issued an order regarding plaintiff DMF, Inc.’s (“DMF”) motion for summary judgment against defendants AMP Plus, Inc. and Elco Lighting, Inc. (collectively, “ELCO”). Dkt. 499 (“MSJ Order’). On March 20, 2020, the Court issued an order regarding the parties’ motions in limine. Dkt. 500 (“MIL Order’). ELCO filed a motion for reconsideration of portions of the Court’s MSJ Order and MIL Order on May 22, 2020. Dkt. 520 (““ELCO Mot.”). DMF filed an opposition on June Dkt. 528 (“DMF Opp.”). ELCO filed a reply on June 22, 2020. Dkt. 531 (“ELCO Reply”). On May 22, 2020, DMF filed a motion for reconsideration of portions of the Court’s MSJ Order and MIL Order. Dkt. 521 (“DMF Mot.”). ELCO filed an opposition on June 8, 2020. Dkt. 525 (“ELCO Opp.”). DMF filed a reply on June 22, 2020. Dkt. 532 (“Reply”). The Court took the parties’ motions under submission on June 30, 2020. Dkt. 533. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court finds and concludes as follows.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.