Ron Sarfaty v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20202:17-cv-03594California6,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I WESTERN DIVISION

RON SARFATY CASE NO. 2:17-cv-03594-SVW-KS Plaintiffs, “ FINDING OF FACT AND CITY OF LOS ANGELES CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Defendant. 17 18 INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2020 and July 23, 2020, the Court held a bench trial in this action to determine whether Defendant the City of Los Angeles (“the City”) violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seg. (the “ADA” or ~ “Title II”), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Section 504”), . and California Government Code § 11135. In advance of trial, Plaintiff Ron Sarfaty (“Plaintiff”) and the City submitted declarations containing their % witnesses’ direct testimony, as required by the Court’s Standing Order for non-jury trials. The parties presented their witnesses at trial, at which time the Court engaged in its own questioning of each witnesses and allowed subsequent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.