Mission Fitness Center, LLC v. Gavin Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20212:20-cv-09824California6,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On October 26, 2020, plaintiffs Mission Fitness Center, LLC; California Crossfit, LLC; Fitness First, Inc.; Rep Max Performance, LLC; SoCal Powerlifting, LLC; Movement FX, LLC; Lyons Property Management Company, Inc.; Jayda, Inc.; KOGym,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL ‘O’

Case No. 2:20-CV-09824-CAS-KSx Date May 10, 2021 Title MISSION FITNESS CENTER, LLC ET AL v. GAVIN NEWSOM ET AL

LLC; House of Gains Gym, Inc.; Gym & Tone It, Inc.; Grey Group, LLC: and Grassroots Yoga, LLC (together, “plaintiffs”), brought suit in this Court against a range of state and local government officials (detailed below). Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs challenge those officials’ various restrictions on business operations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Id. In their operative Second Amended Complaint, plaintiffs allege claims for (1) violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (“Takings Clause’) (claim one): (2) violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (“Due Process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.