Tavin Padilla v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20212:21-cv-03842California4,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Randy H. McMurray, Esq. (SBN 126888) 2 || Rmcmurray@law-mh.com Yana G. Henriks, Esq. (SBN 250638) Yhenriks@law-mh.com 4 || Lauren I. Freidenberg, Esq. (SBN 312428) Lfreidenberg@law-mh.com > || McMURRAY HENRIKS, LLP ||811 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1640 Los Angeles, California 90017 7 |! Telephone: (323) 931-6200 g || Facsimile: (323) 931-9521 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Tavin Padilla and Edith Padilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

g CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

x 14 TAVIN PADILLA, an individual; and Case No.: 21-CV-03842-GW-MRW 15 || EDITH PADILLA, an individual,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

Plaintiffs , ORDER 17 Vv. (MRW VERSION 4/19) Check if submitted without material || CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California} ™0difications to MRW form municipal entity; ERIC HERRERA, an individual: MARCOS RAMIREZ, an 22 || individual: and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER —i—“‘(‘iwsws~s~s~—~S

1|/1. INTRODUCTION 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.