Tahani Creisat v. Petal Card, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20242:24-cv-01027California235 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA J S

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-01027-SVW-KS Date: May 24, 2024 Title: Tahani Creisat v. Petal Card, Inc.

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. District Judge

Paul Cruz Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). On April 10, 2024, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (“Request”) because it failed to provide sufficient information to determine indigency. Dkt. 12. The Court directed Plaintiff to refile a fully completed Request or pay the filing fee, and it warned that if she did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.