Simona Tanasescu v. Sohail I. Simjee, DMD, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20248:23-cv-00110California733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIMONA TANASESCU, Case No. SACV 23-0110-MWF (SP)

Plaintiff

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

SOHAIL I. SIMJEE, DMD, INC., JUDGE et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint (Docket No. 1), the Motions to Dismiss (Docket No. 16) and to Strike (Docket No. 17), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report,” Docket No. 30), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 32), Defendants’ Reply to the Objections (“Reply,” Docket No. 33), and other relevant records on file. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report to which Objections were directed, which is essentially to the whole Report. Although not required, the Court briefly discusses the following points. See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court ha[s] no obligation to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.