Marlon Antonio Munguia v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20242:24-cv-01887California469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-01887-JLS-PD Date: May 26, 2024 Title: Marlon Antonio Munguia et al v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co. et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Charles Rojas N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS

ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (Doc. 18)

The Court previously ordered Defendants MKTS, LLC and Mohammed Nezar- Hatem al Hijazi to show cause why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (OSC, Doc. 18 at 2.) In addition to one other concern, the Court noted that it could not assess whether it had diversity jurisdiction because Defendants had failed to properly allege the citizenship of Penske Truck Leasing, Co. (Id.) Defendants timely responded. (See Paullin Decl., Doc. 20.) The Court now concludes that Defendants have failed to meet their burden…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.