Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:24-cv-03630California208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-03630-DOC-JDEx Date: May 29, 2024

Title: Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER CONSOLIDATING AND

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING

CASE

The Court previously issued an order to show cause why this case should not be consolidated with a related case. See Order to Show Cause (dkt. 13). The deadline for Plaintiff to respond has passed, and she has not responded. The Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order as a concession that consolidation is warranted. See Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros. Inc., 941 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1210 (N.D. Cal. 2013) (holding that not responding to an argument constitutes a concession of the issue).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS this case be consolidated with Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.