Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:24-cv-03630California208 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-03630-DOC-JDEx Date: May 29, 2024
Title: Melissa Ryan v. Loandepot, Inc.
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER CONSOLIDATING AND
ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING
CASE
The Court previously issued an order to show cause why this case should not be consolidated with a related case. See Order to Show Cause (dkt. 13). The deadline for Plaintiff to respond has passed, and she has not responded. The Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Order as a concession that consolidation is warranted. See Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros. Inc., 941 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1210 (N.D. Cal. 2013) (holding that not responding to an argument constitutes a concession of the issue).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS this case be consolidated with Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc.…