Gregorio Gonzalez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20242:24-cv-01301California2,676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORIO GONZALEZ, an Case No. 2:24-cv-01301-WLH-MAR individual,

ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND

Plaintiff, [12] 13 V. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Gregorio Gonzalez (‘Plaintiff’) filed a Motion to Remand. (“Motion,” Docket No. 12). The Court VACATED the Motion hearing scheduled for April 26, 22 2024, finding the Motion suitable for decision without oral argument. (Order, Docket No. 17). As set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. 24 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This case arose when Plaintiff purchased a 2022 Nissan Altima (“Subject Vehicle”). (Compl., Docket No. 1-1 4 11). The Subject Vehicle “was purchased as a new vehicle with an accompanying...new warranty” issued by Defendant. (/d.

8-11). Plaintiff alleges that the Subject Vehicle was delivered to him with “serious defects and nonconformities to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.