Paul D. Carr v. Neil McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No. 5:21-cv-00865-MRA (PVC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DR. SHERIF ABDOU, Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative Second Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the grant of summary judgment for Defendant on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims (Dkt. No. 91), the denial of Plaintiff’s Rule 56(h) motion (Dkt. No. 100), and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Dkt. No. 111.) As explained below, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. Nos. 115 and 120) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendation. Plaintiff objects that the Report…