Daniel Beck v. Weston J. Palmer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20242:23-cv-04525California804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-4525 PA (MARx) Date June 4, 2024 Title Daniel Beck, et al. v. Weston Palmer, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER

On May 15, 2024, the Court ordered plaintiffs Daniel Beck, Cedric Crisolo, and Caroline Le (collectively “Plaintiffs”), who are represented by counsel, by no later than May 28, 2024, to either file a dismissal without prejudice of their claims against defendant Weston Palmer (“Palmer”) in this action (if they now intend to pursue their claims in the bankruptcy case) or, in the alternative, to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice and/or administratively closed pending further developments in the bankruptcy case. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.