Jalen Lampkin v. Kathleen Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20245:24-cv-00743California1,782 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JALEN LAMPKIN, Case No. CV 5:24-00743 SB (RAO)

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SUMMARILY DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS AND DENYING

KATHLEEN ALLISON, CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Respondent. 16 I. BACKGROUND On March 21, 2024, Petitioner Jalen Lampkin (“Petitioner”), a California prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”).1 (Dkt. No. 1.) Petitioner seeks habeas relief from his current state custody arising from a 2020 conviction in Riverside County Superior Court, case number RIF2003912. (Petition at 2.)

25 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is signed. Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 770 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010).

28 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.