Khalifah ED Saif'ullah v.Ron Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:22-cv-04521California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KHALIFAH ED SAIF’ULLAH, Case No. 2:22-cv-04521-MEMF (E)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

RON BROOMFIELD, Warden,

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 12.) As explained below, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 13) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that the Report “erroneously limits federal review of cases on habeas corpus to those for which the Supreme Court has already confronted the 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.