Christopher Barone v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20242:21-cv-04200California2,193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:21-cv-04200-SSS-PD CHRISTOPHER T. BARONE, Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al. JUDGE Defendants. 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), the summary judgment motion filed by Defendants Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy Alexandria Metcalf, and Deputy Heather Parks (“Motion”), the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Motion (“Report”), Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report, and Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Objections. [Dkt. 39, 62–64, 70, 71, 73]. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report to which Objections were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.