F19 Franchising, LLC v. Endo Fitness LL, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20242:23-cv-00185California3,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 F19 FRANCHISING, LLC, a California limited Case No.: 2:23-cv-00185-MEMF-JC liability company; F-19 HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 71] Plaintiffs, v. 14 ENDO FITNESS LL, LLC, a California limited 15 liability company; ENDO FITNESS 3, LLC, a California limited liability company, ENDO FITNESS, LLC, a California limited liability company; ROBERT RODGER, individually; PAUL RICE, individually; PAUL INFALD, individually; and ADAM OSBORN, individually,

Defendants.

21 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Endo Fitness LL, LLC; Endo Fitness 3, LLC; Endo Fitness, LLC; Robert Rodger; Paul Rice; Paul Infald; and Adam Osborn. For the reasons stated herein, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Dismiss. 25 26 / / / / / / I. Factual and Procedural Background A. Factual Allegations1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.