Leticia Espinoza v. Wal-mart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20242:24-cv-03809California721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-03809 PSG (PVCx) Date June 13, 2024 Title Leticia Espinoza v. Wal-Mart, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Derek Davis Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings (In Chambers): Order REMANDING case to Los Angeles County Superior Court. On April 10, 2024, Plaintiff Leticia Espinoza filed a complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Wal-Mart, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc, and Sergia Doe (“Defendants”). See Dkt. # 2-1 (“Compl.”). On May 7, 2024, Defendants Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (the “Wal-Mart Defendants”) removed the case to this Court. See Dkt. # 1 (“Removal”). The Court now REMANDS the case to Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

I. Legal Standard

“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, possessing only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.” Gunn v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.