Carlos Hernandez v. M. Gamboa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. CV 22-1371-SPG (KS) CARLOS HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

M. GAMBOA, Warden, et al.,

Respondents.

17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 21 (“Report”)), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30 (“Objections”)). Pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. For the following reasons, Petitioner’s objections to the Report do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. The Court therefore accepts the Report. Petitioner raised a single claim for habeas corpus…