Downs

Downs v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20242:23-cv-02271California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LADARIOUS DOWNS, Case No. 2:23-cv-02271-PA (PVC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint with leave to file a Third Amended Complaint that is limited to four claims. (ECF No. 25.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (ECF No. 28) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendation. Plaintiff objects that he has a cognizable retaliation claim. (ECF No. 28 at 3- 4.) As the Report…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.