Yaping Chang v. D1 Joyson Safety Systems Acquisition LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20242:24-cv-03097California248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YAPING CHANG, CV 24-3097 DSF (AS)

Plaintiff, Order DISMISSING Action for v. Failing to File a Complete Request to Proceed In Forma D1 JOYSON SAFETY SYSTEMS Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee ACQUISITION LLC, et al., Defendants.

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). On May 2, 2024, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“Request”) because it was incomplete. (Dkt 8). The Court directed Plaintiff to either: (1) refile a fully completed Request and a one-page statement; or (2) pay the full filing fee. (Id.). The Court warned that if Plaintiff did not comply within 30 days, the case would be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order. /// /// /// /// Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See, e.g., Roberts v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.