Tracye Benard Washington v. Trent Allen

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20242:22-cv-04794California512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BERNARD Case No. CV 22-4794-MWF (RAO)

WASHINGTON,

12 Petitioner ORDER ACCEPTING SECOND REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRENT ALLEN, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (“FAP,” Document No. 4), the Motion to Dismiss the FAP (“Motion to Dismiss,” Document No. 23), the Second Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending the Motion to Dismiss be granted and the FAP be dismissed as an unauthorized second-or-successive habeas petition (“Second Report,” Docket No. 31), the Objections to the Second Report (“Objections,” Docket No. 33), and the other relevant records on file. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Second Report to which the Objections are directed. Although not required, the Court notes that Petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.