indieDwell

Gundry Partners, L.P. v. indieDwell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20242:23-cv-03885California694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:23-03885 ADS Date: June 27, 2024 Title: Gundry Partners, L.P. v. indieDwell, et al.

Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge

Kristee Hopkins None Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY

THE COURT (DKT. NO. 76)

On April 23, 2024, after granting Defendant indieDwell’s (“Defendant”) counsels’ motion to withdraw as counsel, and after Defendant’s failure to file a substitution of counsel, the Court struck Defendant’s Answer and Counterclaim (Dkt. Nos. 41, 47), entered default against Defendant, and ordered Plaintiff Gundry Partners LP (“Plaintiff”) to file an application for default judgment. (Dkt. No. 75.) On May 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed an Application for Entry Default Judgement By The Court (“the Application”) requesting a $513,447.88 judgment against Defendant. (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.