Julio Aviles Sr v. USP Lompoc Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20242:24-cv-00776California643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO AVILES, SR., Case No. 2:24-cv-00776-MRA-MRW

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

USP LOMPOC WARDEN,

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends dismissal of the Petition for lack of habeas jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 11.) As explained below, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 12) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that jurisdiction exists because he is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Lompoc, California, which falls within the jurisdictional limits of the Central District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.