Dylan Herrington v. Target Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 5:23-cv-01676-MRA-SHK DYLAN HERRINGTON,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

TARGET CORPORATION, PREJUDICE [ECF 33]

Defendant.

17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Target Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Dylan Herrington’s Third Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). ECF 33. The Court read and considered the Motion and deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. The hearing on the Motion was therefore VACATED and removed from the Court’s calendar. ECF 38. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff Dylan Herrington was formerly employed by Defendant Target Corporation. ECF 31 ¶¶ 3-4. On May 25, 2022, Plaintiff was called into a meeting…