Baries

Rafael Martirosyan v. Baries

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20242:21-cv-06433California716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL MARTIROSYAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-06433-PA (MAR)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

OFFICER BARIES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaints, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends consolidation of Plaintiff’s two actions, the grant of Defendants’ motions to dismiss in part, and the dismissal of certain Defendants. (ECF No. 171 at 2-3.) Plaintiff filed a Response to the Report. (ECF No. 174.) Plaintiff asserts that he “is not [o]bjecting” to the Report. (ECF No. 174 at 1.) Rather, he is filing a “response” or “commenting” on the Report. (Id. at 2.) The response consists of a request that he be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.