Omar Ageel v. R.C. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20242:20-cv-10093California666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OMAR AGEEL, NO. 2:20-CV-10093-JWH (AGR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. R.C. JOHNSON, Warden, et al., Defendants.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 2, 2020, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two officials at the California State Prison, Los Angeles County (“CSP-LAC”), Warden Johnson and correctional officer Coleman. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants were given leave to file a pre-answer motion for summary judgment based solely on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. (Dkt. No. 17.) On June 21, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, including a Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (“SUF”) and supporting evidence. (Dkt. No. 19.) The court set a briefing schedule and notified Plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a summary judgment motion. (Dkt. No. 20.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.