Cynthia Padock v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20248:24-cv-00890California3,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

Plaintiff “physically worked at [a] Whole Foods Market” location in Laguna Niguel, California, “shop[ping] the store for various items, [and] fulfilling pre-designated orders” customers made through Amazon and Prime Now. (Dkt. 1-2 (Complaint, “Compl.”) ¶ 8; see Dkt. 24-1 (Declaration of Jennifer Sorace, “Sorace Decl.”) ¶ 7, Ex. A (Plaintiff’s Job Description).) “For instance, if someone had a shopping list of 30 items – [Plaintiff] would _________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JS-

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 8:24-cv-00890-FWS-JDE Date: July 2, 2024 Title: Cynthia Padock v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al. shop for those 30 items, bag them, and prepare them for either pick up or delivery.” (Compl. ¶ 8.) After her employment was terminated, Plaintiff filed this case in Orange County Superior Court, asserting claims including wrongful discharge, disability discrimination, and retaliation against Amazon, Prime Now, and Whole Foods. (See generally Compl.) Amazon and Prime Now removed the case to this court, arguing that complete diversity exists…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.