Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Lucian Grainge

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20248:24-cv-01362California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-01362-DOC-KES Date: July 2, 2024

Title: RHONDA JOHNSON PAWNELL V. LUCIAN GRAINGE ET AL.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE

Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

Plaintiff Rhonda Pawnell’s complaint alleges federal question as its jurisdictional basis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. However, this allegation appears improper because Plaintiff cites no federal statute, treaty, or provision under which her action arises. Under federal question basis for jurisdiction, Plaintiff’s complaint states: “The basis of the court is all parties are represented by one Label UMG/UMPG. After submitting prior measures for the Defendants to respond. None have rectified the situation.” Compl. at 3. The Complaint goes on to allege that Defendants have wrongfully withheld royalties from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.