Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Lucian Grainge
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20248:24-cv-01362California356 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:24-cv-01362-DOC-KES Date: July 2, 2024
Title: RHONDA JOHNSON PAWNELL V. LUCIAN GRAINGE ET AL.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Karlen Dubon Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
Plaintiff Rhonda Pawnell’s complaint alleges federal question as its jurisdictional basis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. However, this allegation appears improper because Plaintiff cites no federal statute, treaty, or provision under which her action arises. Under federal question basis for jurisdiction, Plaintiff’s complaint states: “The basis of the court is all parties are represented by one Label UMG/UMPG. After submitting prior measures for the Defendants to respond. None have rectified the situation.” Compl. at 3. The Complaint goes on to allege that Defendants have wrongfully withheld royalties from…