Brett Garrote v. Tristar Insurance Group Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:24-cv-02927California217 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 24-02927-SPG-E Date July 3, 2024
Brette Garrote v. Tristar Insurance Group Inc. Title
Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before July 17, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Defendant Tristar Insurance Group, Inc. did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to…