Marilyn Gonzalez v. AutoZoners, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20248:23-cv-02502California657 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN GONZALEZ, Case No. 8:23-cv-02502-JWH-DFM

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

AUTOZONERS, LLC, FRANCISCO FONSECA, and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Marilyn Gonzalez, a California citizen, originally filed this action in Orange County Superior Court. Defendant AutoZoners, LLC (“AutoZone”) removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. AutoZone, a corporate citizen of Nevada and Tennessee, argues that its co-Defendant Francisco Fonseca, another California citizen, was fraudulently joined, so his presence does not defeat diversity jurisdiction.2 As an initial matter in every case, the Court must ensure that it possesses subject matter jurisdiction. District courts “have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, 11 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.