Stephanie La Grow v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:24-cv-00518California4,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 STEPHANIE LA GROW, Case № 2:24-cv-00518-ODW (SKx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v.

REMAND [17]

14 JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On November 27, 2023, Plaintiff Stephanie La Grow filed this putative Class 20 Action Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los 21 Angeles, against her employer, JetBlue Airways Corporation. (Notice of Removal 22 (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) On January 19, 2023, JetBlue removed the 23 instant action on the basis that this Court has jurisdiction under the Class Action 24 Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d) and 1453, and the separate, 25 independent, and alternative ground for removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (NOR 1.) 26 La Grow now moves to remand this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 27 28 1 (Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 17.) For the reasons below, the Court 2 DENIES La Grow’s Motion.1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.