Elizabeth Perez v. Rose Hills Company
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20242:24-cv-04827California604 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-04827-JLS-PVC Date: July 03, 2024 Title: Elizabeth Perez et al v. Rose Hills Company et al
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Charles A. Rojas N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendant:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT
Plaintiff filed this putative class action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, alleging that Defendant violated various California wage-and-hour laws. Defendant removed, asserting that this Court has jurisdiction over this putative class action under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1441(a). (Notice of Removal, Doc. 1.)
CAFA requires, among other things, that the amount in controversy “exceed[] the sum or value of $5,000,000.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). “A defendant’s…