Luis Ramirez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20245:24-cv-00946California921 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS RAMIREZ, Case No. 5:24-cv-00946-FLA (SHKx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 6]

14 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 19

21 22 23

25 26 27 28 RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Luis Ramirez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 6 (“Mot.”). Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Nissan”) opposes the Motion. Dkt. 11 (“Opp’n”). On May 4, 2023, Plaintiff initiated the action in the Riverside County Superior Court, alleging causes of action for fraud and violations of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 1790, et seq.). Dkt. 1-2 (“Compl.”). On May 3, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this court based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Dkt. 1 (“NOR”) ¶ 11. Plaintiff now moves to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.