Theron Aych v. University of Arizona

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20242:23-cv-07282California4,329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 THERON AYCH, Case № 2:23-cv-07282-ODW (MARx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS [41]

14 UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Theron Aych brings this action alleging racketeering, anti-competitive 19 conduct, discrimination, and various tort causes of action. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) 20 Defendants University of Arizona (“UofA”), The Arizona Board of Regents 21 (“ABOR”), Dave Heeke, Jedd Fisch, and Jimmie Dougherty (collectively, 22 “Defendants”) move to dismiss Aych’s claims against them pursuant to Federal Rules 23 of Civil Procedure (“Rules” or “Rule”) 8, 9, 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6). (See 24 Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 41.) Finding the Court lacks subject 25 matter and personal jurisdiction over Defendants, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.