Guri Gonzalez v. SM One Auto, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20242:24-cv-05012California951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:24-cv-05012-MEMF-MAR GURI GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

SM ONE AUTO, INC. D/B/A ONE

COLLISION CENTER; ERNESTO I.

MARTIN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE MARTIN FAMILY TRUST; and DOES 1 to 10, 17 Defendants.

On June 13, 2024, Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez filed a Complaint against Defendants SM One

Auto, Inc. D/B/A One Collision Center, Ernesto I. Martin, as Trustee of the Martin Family Trust,

and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12213 et seq.; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 54, et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.