Karen Noble v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20248:24-cv-01439California1,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

Plaintiff Alleges that Defendant Hyatt Corporation (“Defendant”) wrongfully terminated her on February 28, 2024. Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt 1-2) ¶ 2. Plaintiff then filed this lawsuit, alleging three claims in violation of the Califomia Fair Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code section 12490: disability discrimination, failure to reasonably accommodate her disability, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Id. ¶¶ 3-7. On June 28, 2024, Defendant removed the case to federal court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. See generally Notice of Removal (“Not.”) (Dkt. 1). The Court disagrees.

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-01439-DOC-DFM Date: July 9, 2024 Page

from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part that “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed . . . to the district court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.