Francisco Melgar-Cabrera v. B. Lammer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20245:23-cv-02362California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCO MELGAR-CABRERA, Case No. 5:23-cv-02362-JWH (BFM) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

WARDEN B. LAMMER, Respondent.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the dismissal of this action without prejudice because the Petition, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, does not challenge the execution of a sentence or qualify for the “escape hatch” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). (ECF No. 18.) For the following reasons, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 20) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.