Keimyah Williams v. ABM Aviation, Inc.

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 KEIMYAH WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-02181-ODW (JDEx) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 14 ABM AVIATION, INC et al., REMAND [22] Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Keimyah Williams filed this class action in the Superior Court of the 18 State of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant ABM Aviation, Inc. 19 (“ABM”). (Notice Removal (“NOR”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) ABM removed the case on 20 the grounds that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act 21 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (Id. ¶¶ 9, 12.) Williams now moves to remand. 22 (Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 22.) For the following reasons, the 23 Court finds that ABM establishes the jurisdictional requirements under CAFA, and 24 thus, DENIES Williams’s Motion to Remand.1 25 26

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.…