Damodar Chandra-Das v. Danny Samuels
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 DAMODAR CHANDRA-DAS, Case No. 2:23-cv-03829-FLA (SHK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
DANNY SAMUELS, et al., Defendants.
17 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On October 21, 2023, Plaintiff Damodar Chandra-Das (“Plaintiff”), 20 proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”) against various defendants (“Defendants”). Dkt. 26 (“SAC”). On April 18, 2024, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s SAC with leave to amend. Dkt. 27. In that order, Plaintiff was granted until May 9, 2024, to file a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) and was warned that, “if Plaintiff does not timely 26 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a file a TAC, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed with or without…